Sign in

    CARDINAL HEALTH (CAH)

    CAH Q4 2025 Raises FY26 EPS Guidance $0.20 on Margin Gains

    Reported on Aug 12, 2025 (Before Market Open)
    Pre-Earnings Price$157.66Last close (Aug 11, 2025)
    Post-Earnings Price$141.00Open (Aug 12, 2025)
    Price Change
    $-16.66(-10.57%)
    • Upgraded EPS Guidance: Management raised its FY2026 EPS guidance by $0.20, with about half of that improvement coming from positive adjustments in the liability classification and higher expectations in Pharma and growth segments. This reflects confidence in underlying demand and robust Q4 performance.
    • Strategic Acquisition Impact: The integration of Solaris Health, which adds nearly 750 providers and diversifies revenue streams, strengthens the urology and specialty platform. This acquisition, along with other recent moves, supports accelerated scale and earnings accretion.
    • Operational Efficiency & Margin Expansion: Q&A discussions highlighted strong gross margin improvements driven by cost optimization and a favorable product mix in both core distribution and specialty segments. This margin expansion underscores disciplined expense management and sustainable profitability.
    • Tariff Exposure Concerns: There remains uncertainty around the impact of tariffs despite ongoing mitigation efforts. Discussions in the Q&A highlighted that even with actions to offset some of the $450,000,000 gross impact of tariffs, residual pressures (between $150,000,000 and $200,000,000) and the potential for further pricing actions still pose a risk to margins.
    • Integration and SG&A Cost Pressures: The Q&A revealed that the inclusion of recent acquisitions and individually immaterial items (like bad debt and contractual resolutions) contributed to a higher SG&A expense. This suggests that further integration costs and expense pressures may materialize, potentially impacting profitability.
    • Competitive Bidding in At Home Solutions: Questions raised about competitive bidding in the At Home Solutions segment—specifically in categories like CGMs—highlight a potential risk. While currently representing less than 15% of Medicare revenue, increased competitive pressures could erode pricing power and margins over time.
    MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange

    EPS Guidance

    FY 2026

    $8.05 to $8.15

    $9.30 to $9.50

    raised

    Adjusted Free Cash Flow

    FY 2026

    $1.5 billion

    $2.75 billion to $3.25 billion

    raised

    Interest and Other Expense

    FY 2026

    $200 million to $215 million

    $275 million

    raised

    Effective Tax Rate

    FY 2026

    23% to 23.5%

    22% to 24%

    lowered

    Pharma Segment Profit Growth

    FY 2026

    11.5% to 12.5%

    11% to 13%

    no change

    Medical (GNPD) Segment Profit

    FY 2026

    $130 million to $140 million

    At least $140 million

    raised

    Other Growth Businesses Revenue Growth

    FY 2026

    17% to 19%

    26% to 28%

    raised

    Other Growth Businesses Profit Growth

    FY 2026

    16% to 18%

    25% to 27%

    raised

    Pharma Segment Revenue Growth

    FY 2026

    no prior guidance

    11% to 13%

    no prior guidance

    Medical (GNPD) Segment Revenue Growth

    FY 2026

    no prior guidance

    2% to 4%

    no prior guidance

    Share Repurchases

    FY 2026

    no prior guidance

    $750 million

    no prior guidance

    Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding

    FY 2026

    no prior guidance

    238 million to 240 million

    no prior guidance

    TopicPrevious MentionsCurrent PeriodTrend

    Tariff Exposure and Mitigation Strategies

    Addressed in Q2 and Q3 through diversified sourcing, pricing adjustments, and operational actions to mitigate gross tariff impacts (e.g., referenced in discussions on supplier diversification and leveraging protocols ).

    Q4 continues detailed management with specific headwind targets (net $50–$75M) and initiatives such as selective pricing and brand penetration to offset tariff impacts.

    Consistent focus with enhanced specificity and further operational efficiency, as the company now quantifies headwinds and outlines a clear mitigation roadmap.

    Acquisition Integration and Strategic Impact

    In Q2 and Q3, integration of acquisitions (GI Alliance, ION, ADSG) was emphasized for expanding specialty platforms and driving margin growth (e.g., integration progress and strategic value were highlighted ).

    Q4 shifts focus to Solaris Health alongside other urology acquisitions, with emphasis on EPS improvements and strategic positioning in specialty and urology segments.

    Consistent strategic emphasis across periods with Q4 expanding the narrative by introducing new acquisitions that build on prior integration successes.

    Pharma Segment Growth and Performance

    Q2 and Q3 calls stressed robust organic revenue growth (via GLP-1, generics, and specialty products) and margin expansion—even while offset by contract expiration headwinds.

    Q4 reported strong organic performance with flat reported revenue (once contract impacts are excluded) and raised guidance for fiscal 2026, underscoring continued strength in specialty and new product sales.

    Positive outlook remains across periods, with Q4 providing increased future guidance and reinforcing the segment’s strategic strength despite temporary contract issues.

    Margin Expansion and Operational Efficiency

    Q2 and Q3 emphasized gradual gross margin improvements through cost optimization, SG&A discipline, and early automation investments (with initiatives to control overhead and improve operating leverage ).

    In Q4, margins improved notably (17% gross profit growth) driven by higher-margin specialty businesses and ongoing investments in automation and simplification projects.

    Steady and improving – operational efficiencies continue to build momentum with increased automation and more robust cost-management measures being implemented.

    At-Home Solutions Growth and Competitive Dynamics

    Q2 and Q3 reported moderate revenue growth (around 12–13%) and ongoing integration of ADSG along with targeted investments in automation and efficiency.

    Q4 saw a dramatic jump to nearly 50% revenue growth, accelerated ADS integration, and new concerns about competitive bidding in CGMs, highlighting both rapid expansion and emerging competitive challenges.

    Accelerating performance with an expanded scale and new competitive concerns emerging that could shape future profitability.

    SG&A and Integration Cost Pressures

    Q2 and Q3 detailed modest SG&A increases (3–4%) with strong cost control and normalized expenses as integration of acquisitions like GI Alliance and ION progressed.

    Q4 reported a 16% nominal SG&A increase (only 4% organic) due to recent acquisitions; however, targeted synergy plans and technology investments are already showing promise in mitigating these pressures.

    Integration costs remain a theme, but the focus is shifting to capturing synergies; while nominal costs have risen, organic increases stay controlled, reflecting effective discipline.

    Competitive Bidding in At-Home Solutions (Emerging Concern)

    Not mentioned in Q2 and Q3, with no reference to competitive bidding issues in the at-home segment [N/A].

    Q4 introduced concerns over competitive bidding for CGMs in the Medicare market, noting low exposure and a distinct market structure, signaling potential future pressure in this segment.

    Newly emerged in Q4, this topic raises potential future challenges that were not on the radar in previous periods.

    Liability Classification Adjustments

    No discussion in Q2 or Q3 regarding liability classification adjustments affecting EPS guidance [N/A].

    Introduced in Q4 with explanations on how treating minority interest positions as liabilities enhanced EPS by about $0.05 per quarter and contributed to a $0.20 increase in FY 2026 guidance.

    A new topic in Q4 that positively adjusts EPS outlook, providing clearer insight on non-operational adjustments and their impact on financial guidance.

    Macroeconomic and Trade Policy Uncertainties

    Q2 and Q3 provided a detailed view of trade policy challenges and macroeconomic pressures, with focus on tariffs, reshoring, and regulatory uncertainties impacting supply chain decisions.

    Q4 touched on macro uncertainties mostly in the context of tariff headwinds and regulatory adaptation, with less detailed discussion compared to earlier periods.

    Remains a consistent backdrop; however, Q4 places these uncertainties within the broader tariff narrative, reducing overall emphasis while still acknowledging the policy risks.

    Debt Financing and Capital Allocation Concerns

    Q2 and Q3 contained detailed discussions on debt metrics, financing costs, and disciplined capital allocation strategies including share repurchases and M&A funding.

    Q4 shows a reduced focus on debt financing; while some discussion of leverage (targeting 2.75x–3.25x by FY 2026) is present, the emphasis on capital allocation has been downplayed in favor of EPS and growth narratives.

    Less emphasized in Q4 as the company appears more stable financially, suggesting success in managing its debt and capital allocation priorities compared to earlier periods.

    GMPD Segment Performance Challenges

    Q2 and Q3 highlighted several operational challenges in GMPD, including soft volumes, specific write-offs (e.g., the WaveMark charge), and tariff impacts affecting performance.

    Q4 focused on the turnaround with the highest profit quarter reported, effective cost containment, and improved volume growth, with earlier challenges no longer the main narrative.

    Former challenges in the GMPD segment seem to be receding as operational improvements take hold, marking a recovery from earlier headwinds.

    1. EPS Guidance
      Q: Explain $0.20 EPS guidance add?
      A: Management explained that the updated guidance was raised by $0.20, with roughly half due to a liability classification change (affecting noncontrolling interest) and the other half reflecting stronger Pharma and growth business performance, underscoring continued operational momentum.

    2. Solaris Accretion
      Q: What value does Solaris add?
      A: They noted that Solaris Health brings about 750 providers and roughly $1B in revenue, with accretion expected from scale, efficiency improvements, and synergies within their expanding urology MSO portfolio, highlighting its strategic fit.

    3. GNPD & Tariffs
      Q: How are GNPD trends and tariffs?
      A: Management described GNPD’s profits as back-half weighted—with Q4 as the high point—and explained that while tariffs have an aggregate impact of around $450M, they expect to mitigate about two-thirds through operational actions and selective pricing adjustments.

    4. SG&A Drivers
      Q: What fuels SG&A’s quarterly increase?
      A: The rise in SG&A was largely due to the inclusion of recent acquisitions like ADS and increased investments in technology and R&D; management expects cost synergies to gradually offset these higher expenses.

    5. Pharma Guidance
      Q: Clarify Q4 pharma adjustments?
      A: Management clarified that Q4 pharma performance was modestly impacted by immaterial items such as bad debt and routine contractual resolutions, separate from the larger strategic investments discussed at Analyst Day.

    6. NCI Adjustments
      Q: How does NCI liability affect earnings?
      A: They confirmed that the liability classification from noncontrolling interests adjusts EPS guidance but does not directly impact operating income, with further details to be provided in the forthcoming filings.

    7. Gross Margins
      Q: What drove core gross margin improvement?
      A: Management pointed out that improved margins were driven by a favorable mix from higher-margin specialty distribution and contributions from MSO acquisitions, enhancing overall gross profit performance.

    8. Home Pricing
      Q: How exposed is Home Solutions to pricing?
      A: They stated that less than 15% of at-home revenue is subject to competitive bidding, and a diverse product and payer mix keeps pricing pressures well managed, ensuring a strong competitive position.

    9. Expense Impact
      Q: Quantify pharma expense adjustments?
      A: Management estimated that the incremental expense adjustments in Pharma—stemming from items like bad debt—amount to roughly $10–15M, with some revaluation effects in other income, details to be finalized in upcoming filings.

    10. Expense Clarification
      Q: Clarify extra expense and liability catch-up?
      A: They explained that the minor, individually immaterial expense items were distinct from strategic investments, and the additional $0.05 per quarter reflects a catch-up adjustment post–GI Alliance, with a steady impact expected into FY26.

    11. NCI Impact
      Q: Will FY26 NCI net earnings be near zero?
      A: While exact figures were not provided, management indicated that the net impact from noncontrolling interests on the income statement is expected to be minimal, with final numbers forthcoming in formal filings.

    12. Synexis Growth
      Q: What drives Synexis growth?
      A: They attributed Synexis’s strong performance to a mix of robust new product support and high biopharma demand, positioning the business for significant expansion—with projections reaching around $1B by FY28 as part of a 20% CAGR.

    Research analysts covering CARDINAL HEALTH.